Gee, were there that many?
Here's the list:
Blind Faith
Asia
Traveling Wilburys
The Firm
The Highwaymen
Them Crooked Vultures
Chickenfoot
CSNY
Bad Company
Cream
No order on their list, so no complaints allowed.
Lotta ground covered, but one common thread. Big egos and short life spans. OK
that's two threads.
Not sure about the Wilburys and Highwaymen though. Were they groups, projects,
or larks?
Also wondering just a little about revisionist history ... Blind Faith and CSNY
were definitely hyped at their inceptions as supergroups. So were Emerson Lake
and Palmer, who are happily omitted from Gibson's list. I remember similar hype
about Asia (way too much actually), but I honestly don't remember hearing the
term since.
Bad Company were big, and yes you knew there was some connection to Free, but
did people really think it was a big deal that the bass player had come from
King Crimson, and that they were a super group? Not so much.
And yes the whole concept started by revising history. Cream was referred to as
a supergroup - and they were superb - even though, like really, only Clapton
was known beforehand. Alexis Korner? The Graham Bond Organization? These hardly
made Jack Bruce and Ginger Baker household names.
Anyway, the whole concept is a downer. "Oh boy! Just imagine how great
it's gonna be when these guys get together! It's gonna be amazing!" Sets
us up for disappointment, doesn't it. Best case is the band can't keep it
together for long. Worse case is the music just doesn't live up to the hype.
We do like to set ourselves up, don't we?